Thread: What is considered "Kid-Appropriate Content" in your view?

What is considered "Kid-Appropriate Content" in your view?

  • I stick with the ESRB and the MPA(A)

    Votes: 1 5.3%
  • Ratings are more what you'd call guidelines

    Votes: 6 31.6%
  • lol ratings are cucked so I just decide for myself

    Votes: 10 52.6%
  • I don't believe children should be allowed to use screens before age 17

    Votes: 2 10.5%

  • Total voters
    19

DonDonDonPata

Bridge Burn Man
Open ended question for parents and churchmarms alike.

I let my 4 year old son watch Godzilla King of the Monsters a few weeks ago, since he's really getting into Godzilla and asked to watch it. I'm like "sweet let's go" because even though I'm not personally much of a fan for Godzilla, I did grow up watching some of the movies and it's better than garbage like Paw Patrol and PJ Masks. So we watch the movie and it's violent and intense, but no big deal for the kid. Salty language is peppered throughout including one of the soldiers saying something like "you've got to be fucking kidding me" before getting blasted by King Gidorah. The language is also not a big deal for a kid but in my head I can imagine my mom/dad gasping and scolding the movie. The kids understand that they're responsible for the words that come out of their mouth, not the words they hear other people say. I know some parents who would've been shocked that I even let him watch a PG 13 movie in the first place which I find weird. I'm solidly conservative / religious if my moral compass adds any context to this story.
 
Ratings boards were a mistake and the world has been a worse place since.

Parents who really care about what their kid watches (and generally, barring exceptions, I don't think they should) should at least be willing to put the effort in to even look up a basic summary of it before deciding whether their kid can watch/play/listen to it. If you're gonna have that much control over the kid's life then you do your due diligence in actually researching and vetting instead of looking for a letter or number on the box and deciding everything from that.

But because of laziness, the ratings were created, and many pieces of media have been curtailed to fit in their target rating since.
 
Last edited:
Ratings are just a basic guidelines. Usually it gives overall picture of how questionable the content is for children - does it have violence, sex, bad language, etc. At least, low rating can 100% assure you the content is safe. If it's not, you should watch the content (or read reviews) yourself before making the decision about allowing your child watch it. Blindly using ratings as a an absolute authority is dumb - 7 years old may be older than 10 year if raised or educated differently, based on their experience.
 
I'd go with the ratings are a guidelines thing at the end of the day. I don't think there's a lot of rhyme or reason to rating boards for the most part and I think it is best assessed by the parents, especially in these times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonDonDonPata
It depends on age of course, but from my perspective, if a series / movie uses violence as an or even the primary means to solve a conflict, I do not consider the medium appropriate for children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonDonDonPata
It depends on age of course, but from my perspective, if a series / movie uses violence as an or even the primary means to solve a conflict, I do not consider the medium appropriate for children.

I prefer to let my kids know about the potential horrors of violence and that it very much still does exist in real life but must be used sparingly if a society is to be peaceful. They need to know why humans so often turn to violence and why it is so glorified if they are to understand why it must not be used liberally.

That's my view at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonDonDonPata
I prefer to let my kids know about the potential horrors of violence and that it very much still does exist in real life but must be used sparingly if a society is to be peaceful. They need to know why humans so often turn to violence and why it is so glorified if they are to understand why it must not be used liberally.

That's my view at least.
I do have much less of an issue with a piece of media that has violence in it, but discusses it critically. E.g. Star Trek Next Generation is less of an issue for me than Power Rangers (though of course the latter will not be very attracitve to kids nowadays anyway).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonDonDonPata
I do have much less of an issue with a piece of media that has violence in it, but discusses it critically. E.g. Star Trek Next Generation is less of an issue for me than Power Rangers (though of course the latter will not be very attracitve to kids nowadays anyway).

For me, I prefer for the critical discussion to happen between myself and my kids rather than leaving it to any particular media to feed them the "right" moral message, but I see your point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonDonDonPata
Too bad DunDunDun I also let my kid watch the same godzilla movie when he was 5 years old.
And when he was only 1 year old I was playing dark souls 2 past midnight. My son was sleeping in the bed next to mine until I started fighting that Old Iron King boss.
Then he woke up . Then he saw the boss in the big screen.

zGThUEa.jpg


The he cried like there was no tomorrow.
 
Don't shit on paw patrol. But I let my kids what whatever I feel is good. We watched ghost busters original, back to the future and some other things. Also bluey is pretty fun kids show.
 
in general for TV my kids only watch Latvian or Russian tv shows, i dont want them seeing every second kid as black, thats not how things are here and i wont brainwash them into thinking it should be. It its Moana or that pajeet kid detective show then they can watch it, but if its some shit with all multicultural kids then we wont let them watch it, all one culture is fine but mixed isnt.

Cartoons are different, its the usual paw patrol, 3 kota, bluey, peppa pig etc whatever is on nick jnr except blues clues, that we dont let them watch because of the pro gay shit they promote

All the kids have tablets and we switched to kids youtube for them because my girls started watching my little pony and some of the fan made shit which shows up as suggested or autoplay is straight up brony degenerate shit, talking about fucking, only fans killing etc


My wife took the girls to one of these shows, notice anything missing in the crowds here? Also the absolute butterface titty monster

 
in general for TV my kids only watch Latvian or Russian tv shows, i dont want them seeing every second kid as black, thats not how things are here and i wont brainwash them into thinking it should be. It its Moana or that pajeet kid detective show then they can watch it, but if its some shit with all multicultural kids then we wont let them watch it, all one culture is fine but mixed isnt.

Cartoons are different, its the usual paw patrol, 3 kota, bluey, peppa pig etc whatever is on nick jnr except blues clues, that we dont let them watch because of the pro gay shit they promote

All the kids have tablets and we switched to kids youtube for them because my girls started watching my little pony and some of the fan made shit which shows up as suggested or autoplay is straight up brony degenerate shit, talking about fucking, only fans killing etc


My wife took the girls to one of these shows, notice anything missing in the crowds here? Also the absolute butterface titty monster


Are foxes really popular in Latvia or something? Do they keep the wolves and Russians at bay?
 
Are foxes really popular in Latvia or something? Do they keep the wolves and Russians at bay?
Nothing really special about them, i guess its just cuter than a wolf or bear. My user name is also just a coincidence, no great cultural thing with them

This chick has it as her side kick in her show, i always just assumed it was a way to sell toys, my wife told be that the fox plush toy was quite expensive

 
  • Brain
Reactions: Mickmrly