Thread: The Green Knight looks pretty good

King of Foxes

Penny for your thots
Platforms
  1. PC
  2. PlayStation
Arthurian movie about Sir Gawain vs the Green Knight, obviously hollywooded but hopefully not to woke.




Bonus is my computers wallpaper has been an old western themed re-imagining of this story
DEsSYYE4Sf763m7kfkUQ3PswMA_vLazwjvZ2NcVudwQ.jpg
 
waiting for this movie since the first trailer.

friends bought me a green knight comic novel.

But corona fucked us over as the movie was pushed back. Is there a new release?
 
  • Like
Reactions: King of Foxes
Not feeling it. I could be too biased as I loved the 1984 adaptation The Sword of the Valiant featuring Sean Connery as the Green Knight. This one looks a bit too dark/serious. Green Knight character design looks cool, most of the other creatures not especially.
 
Looks like more race-swapped garbage.
Arthurian Legend and the mythos around it. Ok, that seems interesting to delve into something other than Excalibur, Camelot, Arthur etc...

Sir Gawain is played by Dev Patel, who may be a very fine actor, but has the same effect when Heimdall is played by Idris Elba. Idris Elba is a great actor, comic fantasy or not, he's not indicative of any character from the Norse Sagas.

It's obviously not for me.
 
Arthurian Legend and the mythos around it. Ok, that seems interesting to delve into something other than Excalibur, Camelot, Arthur etc...

Sir Gawain is played by Dev Patel, who may be a very fine actor, but has the same effect when Heimdall is played by Idris Elba. Idris Elba is a great actor, comic fantasy or not, he's not indicative of any character from the Norse Sagas.

It's obviously not for me.
The sad part is I don't think any studio would have been interested if the pitch specified a white actor. If they are so interested in our folk tales why wasn't this adapted until now? Because our myths and culture are only acceptable when presented through a non-white lens.
 
The sad part is I don't think any studio would have been interested if the pitch specified a white actor. If they are so interested in our folk tales why wasn't this adapted until now? Because our myths and culture are only acceptable when presented through a non-white lens.
I used to not care so much until the regressive leftist started to make a big deal about voice actors needing to be the ethnic background of the people they portray.

They don't get to have their cake and eat it, too.
 
Last edited:
I honestly thought it looked great, and while the possibly woke race swapping to an Asian Brtish guy is less than ideal, at least he's a Caucasian, so technically it's the right race, just from the wrong continent, so arguably not much different to using Australians.

Honestly, it looks good enough, and he's a competent enough actor, that I can just shrug and go 'close enough'.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Eneru
Arthurian Legend and the mythos around it. Ok, that seems interesting to delve into something other than Excalibur, Camelot, Arthur etc...

Sir Gawain is played by Dev Patel, who may be a very fine actor, but has the same effect when Heimdall is played by Idris Elba. Idris Elba is a great actor, comic fantasy or not, he's not indicative of any character from the Norse Sagas.

It's obviously not for me.
I dunno who the Green Knight actor is but he looked white to me but then again so does Oscar Isaac. In fact the latter is even "Jew passing" making him ideal for Moonknight.

But yeah I see no issue with the actor since it's not really race swapping being the actor looks Caucasian to begin with.

Having actors play different races they pass for is old as time fwiw. There was an actor who played a Mexican in old Spaghetti westerns who was actually Jewish, for instance.

Imo complaining about a non white actor that already looks white anyhow is no better than SJWs saying only disabled people should play disabled people or trans people should only play a trans person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eneru
Dev Patel most certainly doesn't look white to me. I've said I can on the subject, your mileage will vary.
 
I dunno who the Green Knight actor is but he looked white to me but then again so does Oscar Isaac. In fact the latter is even "Jew passing" making him ideal for Moonknight.

But yeah I see no issue with the actor since it's not really race swapping being the actor looks Caucasian to begin with.

Having actors play different races they pass for is old as time fwiw. There was an actor who played a Mexican in old Spaghetti westerns who was actually Jewish, for instance.

Imo complaining about a non white actor that already looks white anyhow is no better than SJWs saying only disabled people should play disabled people or trans people should only play a trans person.
Oscar Isaacs is white, as are most Latinos, it's just a weird American thing that they believe the descendants or Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans are a different race, because history doesn't go back very far for most of them.

Similarly, Dev Patel is Asian British, born in London, and raised Brtish. Despite his dark skin tone, he is both from the right place, and, since Asians are actually Caucasian, the right race, so I would definitely say he looks tha part, just unusually tanned, which isn't unheard of in Britain.

The fact other roles are played by Australians, who might be closer looks wise, but are from a different (if closely related) culture, as well as the other side of the planet, certainly makes for an interesting thought on what constitutes appropriate casting for the role.

It brings to mind the argument Samuel Jackson made on hiring a Black British actor as the lead in Get Out, which he believed was inappropriate casting, since despite sharing African heritage, African Americans and Black Britains have vastly different cultural backgrounds.

Infact my only reservation is due to the rise in woke casting, using bigotry to cast roles based on appearence over talent. That's harder to justify here, because Dev Patel is a very talented actor, and Asians continue to be under represented in media, particularly in Britain, where they outnumber outnumbered all other ethnic minorities combined, but are vastly outnumbered by Black actors and actresses in the media.
 
Oscar Isaacs is white, as are most Latinos, it's just a weird American thing that they believe the descendants or Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans are a different race, because history doesn't go back very far for most of them.

Similarly, Dev Patel is Asian British, born in London, and raised Brtish. Despite his dark skin tone, he is both from the right place, and, since Asians are actually Caucasian, the right race, so I would definitely say he looks tha part, just unusually tanned, which isn't unheard of in Britain.

The fact other roles are played by Australians, who might be closer looks wise, but are from a different (if closely related) culture, as well as the other side of the planet, certainly makes for an interesting thought on what constitutes appropriate casting for the role.

It brings to mind the argument Samuel Jackson made on hiring a Black British actor as the lead in Get Out, which he believed was inappropriate casting, since despite sharing African heritage, African Americans and Black Britains have vastly different cultural backgrounds.

Infact my only reservation is due to the rise in woke casting, using bigotry to cast roles based on appearence over talent. That's harder to justify here, because Dev Patel is a very talented actor, and Asians continue to be under represented in media, particularly in Britain, where they outnumber outnumbered all other ethnic minorities combined, but are vastly outnumbered by Black actors and actresses in the media.

Let's not go overboard here, guys like the black dude were not running around ancient England and he definitely is not English. At best he could be a gypsy, there are a bunch here in Latvia so I can imagine they pickpocketed their way across Europe to England.

Maybe it's some weird English speaking difference about caucasian but I'm white and that guy is not. He is most definitely not of my race either, you must live with some dark as midnight blacks if that guy looks white with a tan

The movie still looks good
 
Last edited:
Let's not go overboard here, guys like the black dude were not running around ancient England and he definitely is not English. At best he could be a gypsy, there are a bunch here in Latvia so I can imagine they pickpocketed their way across Europe to England.

Maybe it's some weird English speaking difference about caucasian but I'm white and that guy is not. He is most definitely not of my race either, you must live with some dark as midnight blacks if that guy looks white with a tan

The movie still looks good
I think you've got the wrong end of the stick.

I'm not saying the guy from Get Out is caucasian, he's 100% black (but still British), but the asian guy in this Trailer,, Dev Patel, isn't 'white', but both white and asians are actually variations on caucasian, so technically the same race, as opposed to being oriental or black.
 
I think you've got the wrong end of the stick.

I'm not saying the guy from Get Out is caucasian, he's 100% black (but still British), but the asian guy in this Trailer,, Dev Patel, isn't 'white', but both white and asians are actually variations on caucasian, so technically the same race, as opposed to being oriental or black.

No I understood and was talking about the Indian guy.
 
Right, so he's definitely not black, and while he also isn't white, since he's asian, asians and whites are both racially Caucasians, hence my opinion of 'close enough'.

But it's not a caucasian story it's an English story. Also by that logic Asians being under represented doesn't matter because being caucasian is close enough.

The movie looks great but im not going to pretend him and the rest of India are the same as native Europeans
 
But it's not a caucasian story it's an English story. Also by that logic Asians being under represented doesn't matter because being caucasian is close enough.

The movie looks great but im not going to pretend him and the rest of India are the same as native Europeans.
A fair point, but then by that same argument, having a load of Australians in the cast is similarly also not accurate, even if they look more right, while at least he is actually British, and from the right broader cultural upbringing.

It's also got Alicia Vikander in it, who is Swedish, which I'd argue is far worse given the shit her ancestors were getting up to in Britain in real life in the time period this movie is roughly based on.