question is, whos the message for.
The message is for the Day One customers who supported this game because of what they perceived as an anti-censorship developer. Why the publisher would feel the need to send a message directly to the game's most loyal customers is noteworthy.
Agree with this post. I did buy the game because I really wanted to play it. It is a really fun game. Up there with FF7 Rebirth this year for me. The bit of censorship is really annoying and I do not agree with it, but I am not going to let it stop me from playing the game and I don't want to punish the developers for Sony being assholes.
I've had PS as my main platform since the PS1 came out. I've been subscibed to PS+ since it first took form. I have not liked the more Western direction Sony has been taking for awhile. I built a gaming PC, canceled my PS+, will probably skip the PS5Pro and buy games on PC if offered on both platforms. I do think Sony's actions hurt them bit by bit over the long run. I pick and choose my battles and they have been slowly losing me as a customer. I am not spending much money on PS anymore outside of the occasional Eastern game that doesn't release on PC day one.
Buy what you like, but unfortunately it only enables these companies to continue doing it. Once you part with your money, you hand over your leverage.
I think folks like Grummz mean well, but they are misguided. You aren't going to out-petition the SJWs because companies aren't actually "bending the knee" to the SJWs. They already agree with the SJWs.
These publishers use bot armies and bought-and-paid-for influencers to promote whatever message they want. So then they can shrug and say "awww man, the Twitter brigade yelled a lot and we had to cave in", and the anti-woke folks will shake their fists and yell "curse you, SJWs! You are to blame! You convinced Sony to censor this". Then people start to get the impression that if only we could petition as hard as the SJWs, if only we could raise up our voices, the innocent publisher would have to give us what we want, right? No, wrong! The publishers aren't listening to anyone. They've already made up their mind. The "battle" on Twitter is just noise and smoke, it's irrelevant to the decision-making process at these publishers.
Therefore, the only effective message you can send is to not buy the product.
I mentioned in the Sweet Baby thread that this
all stinks of bait. We see every disingenuous argument on display.
Why on earth would a publisher behave this way? Why? If you go in with the presupposition that these companies are ideologically-captured and they despise their customers, it makes sense. If you are under the impression that these publishers are "just trying to make money", the Sweet Baby stuff just doesn't add up.