I just got past the second boss. I don't have any issues with the game, though that second boss annoyed me a bit. The tutorials happen naturally as you play through the game so I didn't mind them. I didn't notice performance issues, but I'm not as hyper sensitive to that stuff as some people. If a game is playable then I really don't care.
If someone gave the game a 7 out of 10, I'd be open to hearing why. I'd be cool with that. It's lower than what I would give the game, but you could still try and justify a score like that though. A 5 out of 10 however, sounds like a score given out of spite. Like one of the developers insulted the guy's mom or something. Very unprofessional
I would give Ash vs. Evil Dead a 5 out of 10, because it's obvious Wayforward wasn't even trying with that game. Every aspect of that game shows laziness and apathy. Mario & Luigi: Brothership however, feels like it was made by people who cared, people who were trying to make a really good game.
That IGN score is bullshit
I think I'm roughly 45% through the game at this point and tbh I can barely stand this game
-Handholding like crazy
-Linear and simplistic lands
-Writing is dull and boring
-NPCs are bland
-Horrible text prompt noises from NPCs
-Extremely childish story
-Bombarded with bland dialogue often
-Lame electrical theme and electrical themed villains, plot, etc.
-Battle theme is mediocre
The only positive aspect of this game is the combat system. They can't fool me, these NPCs in the game? This is like literally a notch above Super Paper Mario's NPCs and even Super Paper Mario had taken the risk with more zany personalities to make up for the shit designs they all had. This is really not a good Mario RPG... For the first time ever in a Mario RPG, and I love Mario RPGs even the mediocre ones I enjoy... but right now I am for the first time actually wishing there were less characters to talk to as the writing in this game is just so fucking lame and boring. I start conversations with NPCs who ALL LOOK SAME 97% of the time just to see if they're going to say something interesting and they seldom do. The main gimmick is that they turn into a UFO to float past gaps but it takes a bit of time and is slow. In Zelda games we used to use Roc's Cape for this shit and we'd fly over that same gap almost in an instant with just one press of a button. I'm playing just to see it through at this point to be completely honest. This is 4/10 work at best, this is the Blue's Clues of the Mario & Luigi franchise. Painfully elementary and I hate to slam it like this but the game deserves to be called out for severe lack of substance. This is one of the most watered down and tasteless RPGs I'll probably ever experience. If this game were a sandwich, it'd be a stale bread and wilted lettuce sandwich
-Horrible text prompt noises from NPCs
I played the first Animal Crossing the day it came out and was excited for it months before it was released. I've played Banjo-Kazooie too and both of those games do the jibberish text-talk infinitely better than this pos game. And it's not even triggering me, the game is just THAT disappointing. It's not a good game bro, and nothing you say is going to change that. This is exactly the watering down that's been taking place for decades now with the Mario RPGs and you're just eating it up for some reason. I'd be praising this game highly if it were worthy of such praise. It's not even worth $20. This is the most generic excuse of an adventure in the Mario series to date. The only reason I'm playing still it is to see if the story has anything to give and because the combat is pretty good. But even so, it's been an absolute slog. Maykit is a fucking sperg too. I knew in my gut not to choose her because she's insufferably annoying and but she has the better items I figured. First Mario game I've ever regretted paying full price for. This game makes my previously most disliked Mario RPG, Super Paper Mario, look good... That's how poor of an RPG this is. There is virtually nothing impressive in Brothership. We knew going in that the combat would be good because it always has been in M&L![]()
I guess you've never played Animal Crossing or Star Fox?
It's hilarious seeing the bizarre way this game is triggering some people.
I played the first Animal Crossing the day it came out and was excited for it months before it was released. I've played Banjo-Kazooie too and both of those games do the jibberish text-talk infinitely better than this pos game. And it's not even triggering me, the game is just THAT disappointing. It's not a good game bro, and nothing you say is going to change that. This is exactly the watering down that's been taking place for decades now with the Mario RPGs and you're just eating it up for some reason. I'd be praising this game highly if it were worthy of such praise. It's not even worth $20. This is the most generic excuse of an adventure in the Mario series to date. The only reason I'm playing still it is to see if the story has anything to give and because the combat is pretty good. But even so, it's been an absolute slog. Maykit is a fucking sperg too. I knew in my gut not to choose her because she's insufferably annoying and but she has the better items I figured. First Mario game I've ever regretted paying full price for. This game makes my previously most disliked Mario RPG, Super Paper Mario, look good... That's how poor of an RPG this is. There is virtually nothing impressive in Brothership. We knew going in that the combat would be good because it always has been in M&L
Cope how you want but this is garbage compared to the likes of Super Mario RPG, Paper Mario, TTYD, Superstar Saga; the top tier Mario RPGs
No, I was definitely expecting M&L but instead it is toddler RPG the game and M&L just so happen to be the ones saving the day. Nothing about this game has any magic to it other than the moves M&L pull off in battle; nothing less and nothing more. If Mario and Luigi were absent from this game and different protagonists took their place the game would sell like 100-200k copies max and be quickly forgotten. This game is meant for 3.5-6 year olds and anyone above that age playing solo is most likely going to be bored to tears. I played Partners in Time up to the second or third level iirc and while it was great I don't remember too much enough about it to be saying it's better than the first two Paper Mario games but my impression was that it was good and the pacing was good as wellSounds like you wanted a Paper Mario RPG, not a M&L. Why didn't you mention Partners In Time, if depth is what you want? That one is hands down the best in the franchise (and imo better than any of the Paper Mario's) if complexity is what you want.
This one looks like something I could enjoy and my kids could enjoy.
No, I was definitely expecting M&L but instead it is toddler RPG the game and M&L just so happen to be the ones saving the day. Nothing about this game has any magic to it other than the moves M&L pull off in battle; nothing less and nothing more. If Mario and Luigi were absent from this game and different protagonists took their place the game would sell like 100-200k copies max and be quickly forgotten. This game is meant for 3.5-6 year olds and anyone above that age playing solo is most likely going to be bored to tears. I played Partners in Time up to the second or third level iirc and while it was great I don't remember too much enough about it to be saying it's better than the first two Paper Mario games but my impression was that it was good and the pacing was good as well
It's probably way more enjoyable to be playing with kids but without them to boost the experience for a video game loving parent, I sincerely doubt there are many who would take time out of their day to defend this lackluster product and claim it is a great Mario RPG because simply put it is far from it
It's going to vary. I was expecting greatness like the first M&L since I saw that the art style was kind of lax. Should have known better from Super Paper Mario about that tbh. I can't commend this as a great M&L game. Zero's entitled to his opinion but he also dislikes a lot of legendary games and classics. He has unorthodox tastes in his games and again it's going to vary from person to person. This game makes me appreciate the so-so Paper Mario: The Origami King a lot more now that I'm pushing myself to endure this trash. I wouldn't be berating the game if it were up to standard obviously but there are just so many things I'm taking issue with in regards to quality. Brothership has zero depth to it. Absolutely none so farI dunno, I've seen a lot of glowing reviews from RPG fans as well as brutal reviews like IGN's 5/10. @zero seemed to like it
It's going to vary. I was expecting greatness like the first M&L since I saw that the art style was kind of lax. Should have known better from Super Paper Mario about that tbh. I can't commend this as a great M&L game. Zero's entitled to his opinion but he also dislikes a lot of legendary games and classics. He has unorthodox tastes in his games and again it's going to vary from person to person. This game makes me appreciate the so-so Paper Mario: The Origami King a lot more now that I'm pushing myself to endure this trash. I wouldn't be berating the game if it were up to standard obviously but there are just so many things I'm taking issue with in regards to quality. Brothership has zero depth to it. Absolutely none so far
No problem. Somebody had to say it. The game is completely overrated. Not like I wanted to dislike it, I'm probably one of like ten here who could talk about the Mario RPGs all day. I figured this was going to be something special since the Mario & Luigi series has been a celebrated IP for many since like 02-03 the beginning of the GBA days. I got stories about that first one, incredible game. Brothership however, it's just not doing it for me at all this time. They really dropped the ball in a lot of ways hereSounds like the end of life cycle Nintendo trash we always get when a new system is coming out, thanks for giving some honest impressions
No problem. Somebody had to say it. The game is completely overrated. Not like I wanted to dislike it, I'm probably one of like ten here who could talk about the Mario RPGs all day. I figured this was going to be something special since the Mario & Luigi series has been a celebrated IP for many since like 02-03 the beginning of the GBA days. I got stories about that first one, incredible game. Brothership however, it's just not doing it for me at all this time. They really dropped the ball in a lot of ways here
Something strange is definitely going on with the way these games are handled. @Chozofication I think it was you who once informed me that Shigeru Miyamoto takes some kind of issue with the Mario RPGs and prevents things from happening in these games or kind of gives them strict parameters to stay in line with? Not entirely sure but it's pretty much been this way since 2004, I'm only expecting one pretty good level per Mario RPG because the games are so watered down every time. It's crazyAlso liked inside story, but ya, seems like paper and brothers series are past their glory days
There's nothing wrong with criticizing the game. I've put even more time into the game since my last post in this thread and I can say for sure that the game isn't perfect and I have some criticisms too. I just get really irritated when people like Franky Family give the game a 4 out of 10.I dunno, I've seen a lot of glowing reviews from RPG fans as well as brutal reviews like IGN's 5/10. @zero seemed to like it
Yeah i'm not as far in the game as you, barely over 10 hours so far, but I maintain that this is one of the weaker m&l games, yet good enough to purchase. I mean yeah, I'm playing it and just enjoying it. It's phoned in but still solid, y'know?Something strange is definitely going on with the way these games are handled. @Chozofication I think it was you who once informed me that Shigeru Miyamoto takes some kind of issue with the Mario RPGs and prevents things from happening in these games or kind of gives them strict parameters to stay in line with? Not entirely sure but it's pretty much been this way since 2004, I'm only expecting one pretty good level per Mario RPG because the games are so watered down every time. It's crazy
Like right now in Brothership, I think it's maybe the eight island I've visited and now I'm finally at an island I would call great. It took about 20-22 hours straight before something worthy of being a part of a Mario & Luigi game takes place in Brothership. If every level were as good as the one I'm on now or slightly better then this game would be much better. Maybe the second half will be consistently stronger, or at least I'm hoping so. But even here on this island, something funny happened that I called out earlier in this thread. M&L were tasked to find this one character's kid brother and of course they look identical lol. The copying and pasting of the NPCs is nuts in this game, it's worse than Super Paper Mario's stick figure and abstract shapes characters. I never thought I'd see the day where Super Paper Mario somehow has the better character designs
That's my take on what I would assume was about 35-40% of the way in, based on when I looked at the map. I'm going to write a full review when I'm finished because I think it's important being such a big fan of the Mario RPGs that I make every point I can to express where the quality lands by the game's end. Nothing is set in stone right now but based on what I've played in the first three to four Mario RPGs 1995-2002 that first 35-40% of Brothership is definitely a 4/10 for meA review needs to truly reflect the quality of a game and a 4 out of 10 is insane.
I would say yea, probably is. Whenever people complained about beginnings in games I always loved them and didn't think they dragged on at all. Like so many would call the Zelda games out for having too long of intros or beginnings but I never thought they were. Brothership however, the pacing is just so horrible for the first 20 hours of play. And my mind has been starving for some kind of stimuli in the story, dialogue, character development, anything really. I don't think the developers did enough in the first half of the gameSeems like a YMMV type of game. However I have to go with track record here. M&L and Paper Mario have been a mostly meh series after the first few titles. If this was unanimously praised I'd jump in but yeah, think I'll skip this (unless Nintendo brings back the selects line at some point and it drops to $20, which will never happen)
That was a great magazine. Their top 200 list of video games was interesting to read. I might even still have that volume somewhereBrothership is a nice reminder that Electronic Gaming Monthly had the best review system ever. You would have gotten four opinions and they would not have all been 5 out of 10