- Platforms
Movie is looking way better than the 2016 nightmare. Trailer seems to suggest Gozer is involved somehow which should be cool.
Hope it's good. I don't mind the kids, just keep the feel of horror and comedy that made the first two films so fun to watch.
The 2016 abomination of a film forgot the horror part.
Bruh keep fucking SNL away from it and pay respect to the original cast and I won't care.
10/10 movie for me if that is done.
But wasn't the original guys SNL as well?
Perhaps it just goes to show the new SNL is ass.
And the comedy. Ba dum tss!Hope it's good. I don't mind the kids, just keep the feel of horror and comedy that made the first two films so fun to watch.
The 2016 abomination of a film forgot the horror part.
The rotting corpse at the diner gives me a little hope.
The rotting corpse at the diner gives me a little hope.
I find it applies in any context.What a weird sentence to read out of context.
Hollywood is just showing and making incels.I see the horror is present in this one. Im the form of this fugly ass Stranger Things kid.
Seriously, apart from Millie the Stranger Things cast has the fugliest kids in the universe.![]()
What were you hoping to see that would make it for you?While I love the original two movies, this one looks like it's not for me. I think I need to let it go. The times of good Ghostbusters movies are long gone.
What were you hoping to see that would make it for you?
If it helps, these kids aren't really kids. The Stranger Things kid is the same age as Dan Akroyd in the first one.I don't necessarily like the kids becoming heroes angle. It's totally unbelievable to me that these nerd kids could suddenly safe the city.
I'm totally aware that I want the feeling back that the OG movies gave me, and that any new movie would have an extremely hard time loving up to those memories.
If it helps, these kids aren't really kids. The Stranger Things kid is the same age as Dan Akroyd in the first one.
If it helps, these kids aren't really kids. The Stranger Things kid is the same age as Dan Akroyd in the first one.
But why Kids?
Wasn't the first one R rated? if not its at least an R in 90s 2000s times. 80's PG 13 was like later on R....
I guess the gender swap bombed so now the age swap.
The best chance for a good GB movie was the Judd Aptaow, Superbad time era.
Rogan, Ferrel, Reilly, Craig Robinson, and Jonah Hill (Rick Moranis role) all in their primes.
80's PG is still like modern day R. Everything was PG back then LOL.The first film is literally rated PG, lol. Judd Apatow humor doesn't fit Ghostbusters, neither do those actors. It's a very dry, subtle humor in the first film where the plot/horror are taken seriously for the most part.
80's PG is still like modern day R. Everything was PG back then LOL.
And the comedy doesn't have to be exactly the same. and I didn't mean Apatow would write it, just during that era of comedies which IMO was the last good era of comedy. Those actors in their comedic prime would have probably been able to make a GB movie work.
Seeing what passes for comedy today, and what is a comedian movie star there is almost no chance to make a good GB film today.