Saruhashi
Member
That's the thing, it's not.
You've been made to believe that the game is one big DEI mess by grifters and those wishing to profit off of your anger.
I've played the game for several hours and haven't come across anything that I would be offended by.
Is the game as good as DA:O? No, it's not. Is it as good or better than DA:I? In my opinion, yes. The combat isn't for everyone, especially if you prefer DA:O's combat and I've said multiple times that the writing reminds me of something you'd find on the CW during the late 90's but other than that it's a solid 8/10 game.
Stop being led around by the nose by people who just want your angry youtube views.
You admit that the game "isn't for everyone" but also want to claim that anyone who doesn't like it is "being led around by the nose". You realise that you can't really have both things there? If it's "not for everyone" then some people won't like it regardless of grifters or whatever.
You admit that the game has CW level writing from the 90s but "other than that" it's a solid 8/10 game. So what if someone wanted to incorporate that CW level writing into their review of the game instead of ignoring it? By your own logic it's more like a 5 or 6 out of 10 game. Except it's only people being led by hate grifters who would think that.
Completely contradicting yourself here.
Other than the negative aspects of the game it's a 8/10 game? LOL. If you think it's not an 8/10 game you must be led around by the nose by angry youtubers! Or, you know, maybe I acknowledged the negative aspects of the game and give it a more nuanced review?