Oh boy, more of the "everyone is special!" shit. No interest whatsoever.
To be fair, there was a whole Captain Marvel family in the comics (They changed the name to Shazam when Marvel Comics sued).Not to mention what's the point when you have a team of literal "Shazams". I'm good on the superpowered cheeky CGI fests. Black Adam filled my quota. If you're gonna do movies like that, you *have* to have the Marvel sheen and polish...otherwise it's just a less shiny turd.
To be fair, there was a whole Captain Marvel family in the comics (They changed the name to Shazam when Marvel Comics sued).
They could have done some really cool stuff with this IP, the Justice Society of America, and Black Adam but they've ruined it by going the cheeky route.
If I were going to make a Shazam movie I would have set the films in the 40s or 50s and brought in members of the Justice Society of America. The original Flash, Green Lantern, Hawkman, etc...
Only thing you got wrong is that Ted Kord was the second Blue Beetle, who took the mantle from the Fawcett comics original Dan Darret, after DC got the rights, but yeah, Ted was Leagues better as a character than Jamie is.While we're on the subject of DC movies that didn't need to be made, the Blue Beetle movie looks terrible.
Like Captain Marvel/Shazam, BB was a Fawcett Comics property acquired by DC. Originally a Batman clone, he's best known for his partnerships with Booster Gold and Guy Gardner. Then DC completely fucked over the character by changing him into something else.
Regardless, the original Blue Beetle was interesting, the new version that DC rolled out with the New 52 isn't, and the movie looks terrible.
You're correct, but they were the same "type" of character. Whatever Jamie is, he's not anything like the original Blue Beetle.Only thing you got wrong is that Ted Kord was the second Blue Beetle, who took the mantle from the Fawcett comics original Dan Darret, after DC got the rights