I saw this thread on Evilore's forum and I had to make the same one here. I think it's a very interesting topic.
So we're talking ancient battles. Armor, swords and good old fashioned bloodbath. So let's say males have 1000 soldiers. How many females would it take to defeat them?
I'd say around 7000 females to defeat 1000 men. Men have more strenght and bodies built for combat. Plus since the male is physically bigger, he can put more armor on him.
Once then start charging, I think ladies wouldn't have a chance. Doesn't matter if the ladies have more bodies if those bodies are weak. And once testosternone kicks in, females wouldn't have a chance.
I think the breaking point 7-1. That's where the females would have a chance, imo.
What's your take?
So we're talking ancient battles. Armor, swords and good old fashioned bloodbath. So let's say males have 1000 soldiers. How many females would it take to defeat them?
I'd say around 7000 females to defeat 1000 men. Men have more strenght and bodies built for combat. Plus since the male is physically bigger, he can put more armor on him.
Once then start charging, I think ladies wouldn't have a chance. Doesn't matter if the ladies have more bodies if those bodies are weak. And once testosternone kicks in, females wouldn't have a chance.
I think the breaking point 7-1. That's where the females would have a chance, imo.
What's your take?
Last edited: