DonDonDonPata
Bridge Burn Man
100%. It doesn't change anything in and of itself.
I think it's embedded in my thinking that we are, for all intents and purposes already in an AI-generated content era. Pixar/Fortnite, political fuchsia and danger hair, sterile photo realism… it's just a wetware C-suite instead of an LLM. I think actual AI is just exposing that all "art" is only as good as its prompts. GIGO.
I think the reactionary allergy to AI is only going to result in a "purity test" which only serves publishers and devs who can afford "acceptable" art… the joke being every digital art tool chain is incorporating AI.
To stretch the music comparison, we didn't have this chicken little concern when music recording went digital; everyone was happy to think their favorite artists were sitting in an dim amber lit studio just feeling the vibes, and not all isolated, not even always there at same time, with an engineer copy-pasting a perfectly quantized "fixed" sample in ProTools and repeating it over and over, exactly how dance music is made… never mind the cost of professional mastering locking small artists out of all major distribution channels before cheap DAWs changed the indie game.
I'm pretty mixed too honestly, just think the Luddite reaction is completely misguided.
AAA devs are getting art assets from unthinking Chinese dev farms at bargain prices already. In terms of end result, AI just cuts out the humans.