Thread: First Look At Fallout Series | starring Ella Purnell, Kyle MacLachlan and Walton Goggins.
I understood that could happened being in vault for over 200yrs.

But my other issue with the vault was the sense of scale. I couldn't tell how big it was. It was weird seeing all those people popped up after seeing so many got killed by raiders. Where are the children? I don't recall seeing any except in Lucy flashbacks.

Silo on Apple showed scale! Wasn't expecting to look like that. But Vaults didn't come close, just felt like it showed only one floor!

Well, there was the sense from the elevator scene before they exited that there were a lot of floors to the Vault. I get that it would be cool if they showed more to it, but at the same time, that's certainly something they can address down the road with the Brother's Storyline. On the second viewing, the absence of the kids at the wedding was noted however, I read it that events kind of kick off in the evening and that would explain their absence. Just from a purely practical perspective with something like this adding kids into the mix would be a production nightmare as they age out over seasons (let's assume Amazon gives this the green light for maybe 2 more). So better seen and not heard as much as possible.

Big fan of Silo, and although both it and Fallout are at different ends of the spectrum as far as drama goes. I'm quite curious as to how they are going to proceed because that show does have prominent roles for Children going forward.
 
Finished the show last night. It was alright. I felt like the resolutions the series arrived at were very much like Fallout game type resolutions. You could almost imagine the dialogue options for some of the final decisions.
 
  • Brain
  • Like
Reactions: ManofTwo and Kadayi
If people want to boycott everything and spend their time solely playing old games, and watching old TV Shows and Films that is certainly their prerogative, but the baseline assumption that somehow the rest of us should care is another matter entirely.

Who is doing that? I don't think anyone here told anyone in particular they shouldn't watch this for DEI reasons. If anything it seems you're irritated other people aren't willing to tolerate the same as you.

Shit is boring to read, and brings nothing meaningful to the table.

What exactly does deriding the ones who say those things bring to the table?

So before 'Woke' everything was absolute gold? Whom exactly are you hoping to convince with that line of reasoning?

No one, because I didn't say that.

Sturgeon's Law is known because it resonates with many people.

So what? Is that supposed to mean something to me? I don't agree with the assertion that 90 percent of everything is crap(that doesn't mean I think everything is good either), and I don't need some old adage to try and assert myself.


Alternatively, I can just continue to call people out on their laughable mid-wit BS.

"Mid wit BS" Dude it doesn't make you any more high minded or intelligent than anyone else for being able to tolerate more of this stuff in media. Acting superior because you're willing to watch media that contains content that others find distasteful is a bit goofy.

As I outlined previously it's pretty much redundant given that DEI is endemic to almost all media presently.

Except it isn't. There's been plenty of productions in the last few years that haven't been compromised by DEI.

The idea that we have to accept this stuff because it's the standard isn't one I can agree with.

Hence, a better question is 'Is it a good watch? ' or 'Do you recommend it?' versus asking for a laundry list of offenses that our resident joyless Wokefinder Generals will avail you of because they obsess about this stuff to the detriment of rhyme and reason.

Better question for YOU. You clearly aren't bothered as much by that kind of material as some other posters are, and that's fine.

Why would anyone enjoy or recommend media that is full of things they don't like? How could they consider it a "good watch". Nine times out of ten if media has these things in it they won't enjoy it, that isn't a "detriment of rhyme and reason". It's a reason, you just don't approve of it.
Wokeness in most cases is a sign of poor quality, especially for anyone who isn't fond of that stuff and even when it isn't it's not a sign of great quality. I don't know if I would agree with the idea that this show is woke, but I definitely would say it's just kind of ok at best.
 
Last edited:
Boy you really showed me and all the other midwits, who can compete with such high intellect jousting.

Smart is knowing when not to waste your time, and attempting to meaningfully engage with the likes of you is most certainly a waste of one's time. I've been on forums a very very long time, there's not much I haven't witnessed and engaged with over the years. When someone has descended into wall-o-text mass quoting the same person to the extent you have, that's a clear indicator they're past the point of reasoned discussion and are simply trying to save face, because they mistakenly think other people care. The intention is never to be honest and truthful in a discussion versus increasingly hysterical and obtuse in their responses and simply hope that the other person will eventually get bored of the runaround and tap out, so they can feel victorious.

Now do you want to talk about the merits of the Fallout show, or are you going to dissect the above into individual sentences and take umbrage with every single one at length, and gum up the thread further?
 
Smart is knowing when not to waste your time, and attempting to meaningfully engage with the likes of you is most certainly a waste of one's time. I've been on forums a very very long time, there's not much I haven't witnessed and engaged with over the years. When someone has descended into wall-o-text mass quoting the same person to the extent you have, that's a clear indicator they're past the point of reasoned discussion and are simply trying to save face, because they mistakenly think other people care. The intention is never to be honest and truthful in a discussion versus increasingly hysterical and obtuse in their responses and simply hope that the other person will eventually get bored of the runaround and tap out, so they can feel victorious.

Save face? There's nothing to win here dude, and you haven't even engaged meaningfully enough with anything I've said to the point where you could justifiably claim that. Hell you've outright been putting words in my mouth here.

You started this meting out judgments and recriminations because people weren't discussing the show in the manner you approve of. Not me. I've attempted to discuss this respectfully,since I think most of us are generally pretty reasonable people. Yet here you are yet again tossing out yet another condemnation.
Now do you want to talk about the merits of the Fallout show, or are you going to dissect the above into individual sentences and take umbrage with every single one at length, and gum up the thread further?

Ah yes, the ol I have the high ground. You taunt me, then dare me to respond as though if I do so I'm some kind of lunatic. Get off your high horse dude.

Why ppl hating Maximus.

I think they captured the hero complex pretty well with him. He wants to do good but at the same time he wants live and fucks up a lot along the way.

That not the definition of a hero but a selfish person. Which I think suits him well.

It's because he just isn't likeable at all. Take an actual good character with a hero complex like Cooper from Twin Peaks. He's a great guy and has done real good. Yet his inability to let things go and his need to try and fix everything, even after he's won could possibly have doomed everyone.

Not watching due to
killing the New California Republic offscreen.

To be fair, I dont think they have enough money to even properly depict the New Republic, much less their downfall.
 
Save face? There's nothing to win here dude, and you haven't even engaged meaningfully enough with anything I've said to the point where you could justifiably claim that. Hell you've outright been putting words in my mouth here.

Again whom are you hoping to convince? I outlined that this endless woke-hunting is largely banal, pointless, and isn't much of an indicator of a show's quality in these times because Sturgeon Laws still holds true, and that you in your own protestations were effectively echoing it. Everything you've posted since has essentially been a variation of: -.

little-britain-vicky-pollard.png


Because ultimately you can't refute it as an argument. Most of anything creative is largely garbage. Call Me Chato has a whole series dedicated to looking at TV shows from the past based on the yearly TV listings then goes into how most of them end up getting shuttered within a few episodes or a season or so before being canceled. With the odd gem breaking out to 4-5 seasons, becoming syndicated and then part of the broader cultural landscape, versus the ones that fall off into obscurity.



Hell, Call Me Chato even looks at Fallout and gives his assessment, and brings up the issue of DEI trepidation, in a once-bitten, twice-shy manner. It's fine to be wary of things beforehand, but when the show is there for people to see and judge you do so on its merits as a piece versus some laundry list of perceived offenses. The ingredients are not the recipe.



Fallout is an entertaining show that does a good job of staying true to the IP it is based on. It's probably not going to win any Emmys (though maybe some technical awards for make-up and sets) but it is a worthwhile watch if you're a fan of the games and isn't the preachy wokefest like some people here would have you believe. Who knows maybe Nolan and Joy will fuck up season 2 like they did with Westworld, however assuming Amazon Greenlight more I'm at least interested to see where they go with it.
 
I outlined that this endless woke-hunting is largely banal, pointless, and isn't much of an indicator of a show's quality in these times because Sturgeon Laws still holds true, and that you in your own protestations were effectively echoing it. Everything you've posted since has essentially been a variation of: -
I pointed out that people ARENT being unreasonable for not bothering with this show for entertaining one of the most divisive social issues today. You made the argument that this somehow that makes them equivalent to the radicals on Resetera. It doesn't. If it did they would be demanding the producers of this show be fired, their public humiliation, the loss of their ability to hold a job and their permanent dehumanization. Everyone who watched the show would be labeled some kind of monster and othered. These folks are simply saying they won't watch. I can't get mad if people refuse to eat their mashed potatoes when there's a bit of shit sprinkled in.

As far as Sturgeon's Law goes, I simply don't agree with it.
Because ultimately you can't refute it as an argument. Most of anything creative is largely garbage.

Ultimately it can't be proven either. Even then, garbage by whose estimation? One man's trash is another's treasure and all that. There's plenty of films and tv shows I don't think are very good but others really enjoy. There is no standard, just different tastes. Some of my friends specifically enjoy watching things because they think they're bad.

I don't think most of anything creative is garbage, and I think it cannot reasonably be stated either, simply based on the fact that it's impossible to consume every piece of media. There's a gross amount of shows and films that come out worldwide. Maybe the argument can be made if you live in some Americentric bubble, but even then there's plenty of film and tv productions that are good and not ESG slop.

If the argument was most creative productions are mediocre then I'd probably agree. Outright shit? Nah I can't get on board with that. That's just my personal opinion.

Even if Sturgeons Law objectively was objectively true in all instances, it still wouldn't mean that wokeness is not a signifier of poor quality. Simply from the fact that even if most media is bad, there can be plenty of indications of what kind of bad it will be. Most of us have plenty of experience watching DEI approved media at this point, and most of us have had bad experiences as a result.

There's different types of bad, and a bad ESG production is not on equal standing with a normal bad production. I, like most people can sit through a bad movie and not feel personally insulted when the curtain closes, with shitty ESG films that isn't the case.
Call Me Chato has a whole series dedicated to looking at TV shows from the past based on the yearly TV listings then goes into how most of them end up getting shuttered within a few episodes or a season or so before being canceled. With the odd gem breaking out to 4-5 seasons, becoming syndicated and then part of the broader cultural landscape, versus the ones that fall off into obscurity.

A show being shuttered or cancelled doesn't automatically make it bad though. There's been plenty of entertaining shows with promise that have been killed before coming into their own. Failing to reach syndication isn't necessarily a sign of quality/potential. There are a lot of shows that have very long lifespans that I think most people would agree aren't very good at this point like Family Guy or the Simpsons.

Fallout is an entertaining show that does a good job of staying true to the IP it is based on. It's probably not going to win any Emmys (though maybe some technical awards for make-up and sets) but it is a worthwhile watch if you're a fan of the games and isn't the preachy wokefest like some people here would have you believe. Who knows maybe Nolan and Joy will fuck up season 2 like they did with Westworld, however assuming Amazon Greenlight more I'm at least interested to see where they go with it.

I personally think it's just kind of ok, with some very bland and boring moments with really good moments sprinkled throughout. Damn near every scene with Cooper in it is gold.
I see some Fallout fans feel personally insulted by some of the decisions this show has made, outside of the one random weirdo.

I don't think anyone is accusing this show of being a "preachy wokefest", and I agree with you that they'd be wrong with if they did/have. It's mostly just people decrying the inclusion entirely, and either expressing their displeasure with it and moving on or just refusing to watch on principal, which is fine. I don't think it's fair to attack them for that.
 
I still don't get why you people get so riled up here.
I mean, I ripped Rings of Power, Witcher and Wheels of Time a new one in regards to lame unrealistic DEI/ESH crap put into it.

But that one tranny who was barely on screen for a minute in one episode in a show about an apocalyptic future in one of the most diverse countries on earth? Plus a bit of alternate timeline 50ies where blacks where more integrated already?

I can really live with that.
 
I still don't get why you people get so riled up here.
I mean, I ripped Rings of Power, Witcher and Wheels of Time a new one in regards to lame unrealistic DEI/ESH crap put into it.

But that one tranny who was barely on screen for a minute in one episode in a show about an apocalyptic future in one of the most diverse countries on earth? Plus a bit of alternate timeline 50ies where blacks where more integrated already?

I can really live with that.

For me, it's the shameless, naked injection of "current day hot-button issue" that really serves no purpose to either a character or the larger story. It's boring, unimaginative point scoring for the clapping seals whose whole persona is liberal political talking points. It feels artificial and treating people as a quota to be met is insulting to the demographic these characters are representing.

Wow, the trans-girl was literally a vehicle for showing Maximus is a cowardly weasel. Now let's banish her to irrelevancy. I don't think that helps trans-people feel valiated or welcome, they're just a box-ticking exercise.
 
Last edited:
  • This tbh
Reactions: Dacon
Wow, the trans-girl was literally a vehicle for showing Maximus is a cowardly weasel. Now let's banish her to irrelevancy. I don't think that helps trans-people feel valiated or welcome, they're just a box-ticking exercise.
Would you prefer her/him/it having a more fleshed out role then?

I am sure it really was just a box ticking exercise. I feel the director didn't want that stuff in there, but he had to do at least a couple of things on the list.

"Let the perfect not be the enemy of the good".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amorous Biscuit
Would you prefer her/him/it having a more fleshed out role then?

I am sure it really was just a box ticking exercise. I feel the director didn't want that stuff in there, but he had to do at least a couple of things on the list.

"Let the perfect not be the enemy of the good".

There are checklists with woke shit that needs to be in there, or it won't get greenlit. The director had to include it either way, so it's only a matter of how it was handled. Seems like it was handled quickly and then forgotten, which is the best possible outcome given the situation.

That said, I don't watch any of that shit, nothing from Amazon or Netflix exactly because they demand the shit to be in there.
 
There are checklists with woke shit that needs to be in there, or it won't get greenlit. The director had to include it either way, so it's only a matter of how it was handled. Seems like it was handled quickly and then forgotten, which is the best possible outcome given the situation.

That said, I don't watch any of that shit, nothing from Amazon or Netflix exactly because they demand the shit to be in there.

That's too dichotomic for me.
I can live with a little bit of woke shit.

Just don't let it get completely out of hand. Which happens unfortunately with a lot of movies and series these days.

But in FO this is so mild and its setting so forgiving in its context in that regard that I really don't care.
 
Would you prefer her/him/it having a more fleshed out role then?

I am sure it really was just a box ticking exercise. I feel the director didn't want that stuff in there, but he had to do at least a couple of things on the list.

"Let the perfect not be the enemy of the good".

Sure! Maybe it doesn't work in this instance, I understand that not every character on-screen can be granted rich backstories or fleshed out personas but as I said, there's an air of insincerity to it when there's just a random trans person inserted into media.

You're right to use that quote, we are incredibly critical of modern media to a fault but I think there's a wider feeling of dissonance that crops up when dealing with subject matter that doesn't really lend itself to what the story is portraying. Regardless of it being sci-fi and fantastical, with unrealistic elements, I think survival would deem it downright stupid to play make believe in a scenario such as the one presented in Fallout.
 
You know I just revised a video I had saved about the Enclave and it checklist almost everything that's happening today

1) Removal of democratic norms including political prosecution
2) Environmental purity including climate change, political purity and genetic purity
3) Using China and Russia as escape goats for expanding a surveillance state
4) President hiding in a bunker
5) Hording of scientific minds and technology
6) Using proxies for war while not getting their own hands dirty.
 
  • Brain
Reactions: Kadayi
That's too dichotomic for me.
I can live with a little bit of woke shit.

Just don't let it get completely out of hand. Which happens unfortunately with a lot of movies and series these days.

But in FO this is so mild and its setting so forgiving in its context in that regard that I really don't care.

On point. It's not the ingredients, it's how they are used at the end of the day. If the show went down the patronizing preachy route like She-Hulk or The Umbrella Academy I could get behind the hate and ridicule, however, there wasn't any of that going on (the pre-release DEI fearmongering for FO was a nothing burger). Some people though are fucking triggered by the simplest shit, and get their tendies in a twist at the drop of a hat. REE mindset in full effect. Such people need to be mocked, just like we mocked Era over their conduct regarding CP2077.

A show's success ultimately comes down to the quality of the writing, the direction, the performances, and the approach of the showrunners. Did they knock it out of the Park with FO? Not entirely (there's room for improvement). However, what they got right far outweighs what they got wrong, compared to say RoP, Willow, Cowboy Bebop, Obi-wan Kenobi, etc etc. Yet here there are people having conniptions over a trans actor in a small role. I'll be honest I didn't even read them as trans, I just figured they were a bull dyke lesbian and left it at that. Either way, it didn't bother me, enough to be 'Fuck this shit' I'm out of here unlike some. I was more bothered by Lucy's Brother Norm looking like he was adopted because he bears no family resemblance to either his father, mother, or sister in any meaningful way. To my mind casting dropped the ball on that front, however, who knows, maybe there is some intention to it and that will come out down the road, assuming a second Season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amorous Biscuit
I still don't get why you people get so riled up here.
I mean, I ripped Rings of Power, Witcher and Wheels of Time a new one in regards to lame unrealistic DEI/ESH crap put into it.

But that one tranny who was barely on screen for a minute in one episode in a show about an apocalyptic future in one of the most diverse countries on earth? Plus a bit of alternate timeline 50ies where blacks where more integrated already?

It was the bad writing and way too much dialogue that killed it for me. I was playing Fallout when the other kids were playing FF7 and Ocarina. It is the fan's prerogative to criticize a franchise they've followed for awhile. I'm also one of those haters who didn't think Fallout 3 was all that great for similar reasons: didn't feel like the writers had a good grasp of the IP they were handling.
 
Of course CEO is a black WAMANZ in an interracial relationship..

I am shocked that the PIP boy wasn't designed after DRUMPF because he caused the erection on Jan 6th and dropped the nuclear bombs on BLM.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: ManofTwo
I thought of something else positive to say about this series.

If the series is successful, then perhaps Bethesda would consider doing Fallout Tactics or Fallout 1 & 2 in the Baldurs Gate 3 engine. I doubt it, and the more NPC's who clap at current thing only means the Overton Window licking will continue to dilute the IP. So there is a risk of a monkey paw's wish around that noticing.
 
Last edited:
I'm never going to watch this so my opinion on the content is worthless.

Something that I do wonder about though is why people are so eager to see their favorite videogame stuff turned into movies or TV shows?

Seems to me like most of these productions are basically aimed at people who have vaguely heard of something called "Fallout" but aren't really into the games but will watch the show because it's connected to a known brand.

For people who actually liked the games, why wouldn't you just play the games?

Does having a very expensive reproduction of the thing you like on screen add a sense of validation or extra prestige to the franchise?

I think it's kind of the same with books. At the time Rings of Power was releasing you could see all of the Tolkien fan channels and so on making a big fuss over it but it's not like the show was actually written by Tolkien or anything like that. At best it's just very expensive fan fiction. Fan fiction that isn't afraid to just throw lore in the trash.

Especially on a videogame forum I do find it interesting if we are basically saying that we are excited to see some loose copy of the game that we don't have to spend so much time on and don't have to spend the effort actually playing the content.
 
Seems to me like most of these productions are basically aimed at people who have vaguely heard of something called "Fallout" but aren't really into the games but will watch the show because it's connected to a known brand.

For basically every other videogame ip turned into a show or a movie I'd agree, but honestly the people making this show do appear to have a firm grasp on Fallout, from the bigger stuff like it's aesthetics and atmosphere to all the little details sprinkled throughout. They really did a bang up job. There are changes to some of the lore but they nailed it otherwise.
 
I'm never going to watch this so my opinion on the content is worthless.

Something that I do wonder about though is why people are so eager to see their favorite videogame stuff turned into movies or TV shows?

Seems to me like most of these productions are basically aimed at people who have vaguely heard of something called "Fallout" but aren't really into the games but will watch the show because it's connected to a known brand.

For people who actually liked the games, why wouldn't you just play the games?

Does having a very expensive reproduction of the thing you like on screen add a sense of validation or extra prestige to the franchise?

I think it's kind of the same with books. At the time Rings of Power was releasing you could see all of the Tolkien fan channels and so on making a big fuss over it but it's not like the show was actually written by Tolkien or anything like that. At best it's just very expensive fan fiction. Fan fiction that isn't afraid to just throw lore in the trash.

Especially on a videogame forum I do find it interesting if we are basically saying that we are excited to see some loose copy of the game that we don't have to spend so much time on and don't have to spend the effort actually playing the content.

It's set in the same Fallout universe, but it's not like TLOU TV series simply retelling the game story. Most people have praised it for being pretty true to the games, including Tim Cain himself. He got to go and see the first 2 episodes at a Hollywwod premiere press event. I've cut to the part where he talks about his impressions of the show proper versus his preamble about getting there.



Maybe he'll do a follow-up down the road having watched the whole thing and say it sucked donkey ass, but he seemed pretty stoked about it all.
 
Related but not really, is there any word on optimization for the Fallout 4 "next gen" update? I may finally finish the game.
 
There is a theory floating around that the next Fall Out is in San Francisco.

Because Howard asked the studio to avoid certain places so they don't become canon.
 
  • Shocked
Reactions: Kadayi
I have seen Episode 6 now.
Still like it a lot.
I am just a little bit scared of that they might be opening up too many mysteries and not solving any of these in the end.
I mean things should start wrapping up a bit now, but at the moment they even introduce new weird shit.

I really hope they don't pull off a JJ Abrams with this.
 
I'm only four episodes in, but I don't like Maximus' character. A realistic sociopathic personality type is very ill-suited for a protagonist. If it has to be done, the character/actor needs to exhibit a tremendous amount of charisma (see Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction).
 
  • This tbh
  • Like
Reactions: Arkam and Dacon